|
|
Post by TrayWithAnA on Jan 17, 2014 22:46:05 GMT -6
*Since I somehow was the only guy with 16 I deleted the only guy that Training Camp somehow added on my team. Team Ranking is based on Total Change divided by Player Count. Plan on doing some more analysis with Quail and Balls later this weekend. |
|
Soundwave
Full Member
Toronto Raptors
Winter is coming
Posts: 2,465
|
Post by Soundwave on Jan 17, 2014 22:50:14 GMT -6
Damn good work Tray, that was quick.
|
|
|
|
Post by Conroy on Jan 17, 2014 23:08:59 GMT -6
quick indeed Tray. Also my FFA scrubs must have had a terrible TC I was around +49 or so only counting my top 9 guys.
|
|
|
|
Post by DarthVegito on Jan 17, 2014 23:09:46 GMT -6
I want to point out something that I don't think has ever been pointed out. These SAME exact increases and decreases,small and large, happened the same way in TC in the PR league. Problem was a guy could go down 20 points in one rating and all you saw was that he went from an "A" to a "B". No big deal we always thought. Well now that we can see every single point and count them out we can exactly see just how harsh or nice TC was. Just want you to keep that in mind. Bottom line is for the most part is this: Old guys get worse. Young guys with potential get better. I think this is how it goes most of the time. Of course for both years now we have seen young guys get hammered. Last year Coleman and some others, this year LJ, Dikembe, and a few others. But I've also seen many potentials go up this year as well. This shit is random guys. Wish I could give you a formula to get it perfect everytime. But that doesn't exist. TC is random just like the games and FA and playoffs and so on. Things stay consistent for the most part but then shit happens. Sorry if the shit happened to you this year.
|
|
|
|
Post by 78 on Jan 17, 2014 23:23:32 GMT -6
I knew it was random. That's why it's tedious stuff. Different from doing depth charts.
|
|
|
|
Post by TrayWithAnA on Jan 17, 2014 23:32:57 GMT -6
Top 100 Worst and Best added
|
|
Soundwave
Full Member
Toronto Raptors
Winter is coming
Posts: 2,465
|
Post by Soundwave on Jan 17, 2014 23:37:06 GMT -6
My top 10 projected players (5 starters and their main backups) averaged +23 per player.
Buck Williams who is my 5th or 6th big and old went down -42, And Mark Aquirre my projected 3rd SF went -20 skewing my results.
|
|
|
|
Post by TrayWithAnA on Jan 17, 2014 23:41:12 GMT -6
My top 10 projected players (5 starters and their main backups) averaged +23 per player. Buck Williams who is my 5th or 6th big and old went down -42, And Mark Aquirre my projected 3rd SF went -20 skewing my results. It's hard to take out those outliers since real DCs aren't due until Wednesday. Could make for another interesting analysis though. take the top 8 on everyone's DC and then rerun the numbers |
|
|
|
Post by TrayWithAnA on Jan 18, 2014 0:00:09 GMT -6
I have 3 guys in the top 50 and 1 guy in the bottom 100. Of course that guy in the bottom 100 has $8.8M in guaranteed money, $3.3M more than the $5.5M to the other 3 combined.
All the while, I see your sexy ass, Elden Campbell. Probably Lang's deal that didn't even give my max offer a chance to be accepted.
|
|
|
|
Post by coltsguy510 on Jan 18, 2014 1:32:03 GMT -6
You bitches are going down! All my starters improved and Grants gonna be a fucking monster! Looks like the east is more up for grabs than previously thought.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2014 10:29:07 GMT -6
Distribution between ages of average net change for TCs  |
|
|
|
Post by TrayWithAnA on Jan 18, 2014 10:36:48 GMT -6
Distribution between ages of average net change for TCs Who the hell is 43 and still in our league? Damn! |
|
|
|
Post by TrayWithAnA on Jan 18, 2014 10:37:43 GMT -6
Distribution between ages of average net change for TCs Contracts should be taking this into account. Wow. |
|
|
|
Post by IamQuailman on Jan 18, 2014 10:44:49 GMT -6
Distribution between ages of average net change for TCs Contracts should be taking this into account. Wow. Most of the negative points come from conditioning though. Not that it makes it any better. We never knew in the old league how much impact conditioning had (those ratings were hidden from us). A lot of their ratings for skill may have stayed the same, dipped slightly or gotten better. Still, all that said, older = decline. |
|
|
|
Post by DarthVegito on Jan 18, 2014 11:17:21 GMT -6
Contracts should be taking this into account. Wow. Most of the negative points come from conditioning though. Not that it makes it any better. We never knew in the old league how much impact conditioning had (those ratings were hidden from us). A lot of their ratings for skill may have stayed the same, dipped slightly or gotten better. Still, all that said, older = decline. Exactly. You know looking at all these charts and whatnot. It appears more and more that TC is more constant and consistent than everyone makes it out to be. Young improves, old declines. And then we have our one offs of course every year. But that happens in real life as well. Always have first round busts, and usually have late round guys who over achieve. I'm liking the overall results of TC more and more as I look at all the data you guys have been posting. |
|
Soundwave
Full Member
Toronto Raptors
Winter is coming
Posts: 2,465
|
Post by Soundwave on Jan 18, 2014 11:19:40 GMT -6
Let us not forget ROY averages -66.
|
|
|
|
Post by DarthVegito on Jan 18, 2014 11:24:40 GMT -6
Let us not forget ROY averages -66. LMAO and there's that. If you think you have a Roy candidate you better play for the ship in year one. Lol |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2014 11:25:04 GMT -6
No shit man.
|
|
|
|
Post by TrayWithAnA on Jan 18, 2014 11:31:51 GMT -6
What was LJ's TC from last year?
|
|
|
|
Post by Nick Malone 77 on Jan 18, 2014 12:58:09 GMT -6
Wonderful to see Bimbo do so well. He and Gugliotta and Elliot are gonna be keys to the Hornets success. Danny Ferry, you disappoint me big fella.  |
|
|
|
Post by IamQuailman on Jan 20, 2014 12:46:20 GMT -6
(Tray)AWARDED 5 POINTS! THANKS FOR YOUR CONTRIBUTION!
|
|
credit loco for photoshop
