Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 22, 2013 13:20:08 GMT -6
Not really, it was just a bad argument. Has to be 2 people willingly wanting to argue. I wasn't. Just my opinion. If I wanted to prove it then I would, but I don't. People said they thought Indiana would have a better chance. You argued you opinion that the Knicks would do better and were the second best team in the league. You can keep saying it wasn't an argument, but you certainly sounded like you were arguing on Skype. Not sure why it's a big deal at all. If you were trying to troll like you said you were, no biggie. I didn't even say the Knicks weren't one, i said it's very debatable.
|
|
|
Post by TrayWithAnA on Dec 22, 2013 14:30:15 GMT -6
Screw the Knicks, I'm on Team Pacers.
(Is that where we are going with this?)
|
|
PaulyP
Junior Member
Posts: 605
|
Post by PaulyP on Dec 22, 2013 15:23:32 GMT -6
Starting to wonder what else you guys say on skype behind my Pacers' back, hmmm You should jump on and defend your team when quail does his normal "Why the Pavers suck" segment I definitely will jump on sometime during the playoffs for sure To add to this "debate" for which team is better, on paper my backcourt is much more dynamic than NYK. Augmon-Pierce-Humphries is leaps and bounds better than Legler-Starks-Brooks and its not even close to me. Not sure how you can argue the other way.
|
|