|
Post by DarthVegito on Nov 12, 2014 17:05:51 GMT -6
Nick you're doing a great job. The one suggestion is the one person not doing it over and over though. If someone's good at it and the rest of the divisions have to go through all of their guys, it's not fair for that one division to get their best "picker" to constantly do it. If the division misses, they miss and thats part of the pick em. We lost a pickem because of that 2 seasons ago and i believe the Midwest lost last year because of that. If the divisions want to win, put it on their fellow division mates to inform them. I don't think you should have to run the pick'em and be the baby sitter. Ryan couldnt keep up with being a baby sitter. Doug couldn't keep up with being a baby sitter, and you shouldn't have to either. Let the respective division mates baby sit. Also, i thought we implemented a rule as i stated earlier where 1 person can't pick over a set amount of times or keep all things equal? Well this will be the last year of the pick em. I'm not going to lose out on points because other GMs suck at life. Hell no to that. Everything else in the league is by participation, meaning if they want to participate they can. Why not just get a group of GMs who agree to do this and then penalize from that group. I'm sorry but this will have to be revamped if that's the direction it's going to go. I don't mind losing because someone just sucks at making correct picks, but I'll be damned if I lose because GMs aren't participating. That my friend is in no way fair.
|
|
|
Post by IamQuailman on Nov 12, 2014 17:08:05 GMT -6
Nick you're doing a great job. The one suggestion is the one person not doing it over and over though. If someone's good at it and the rest of the divisions have to go through all of their guys, it's not fair for that one division to get their best "picker" to constantly do it. If the division misses, they miss and thats part of the pick em. We lost a pickem because of that 2 seasons ago and i believe the Midwest lost last year because of that. If the divisions want to win, put it on their fellow division mates to inform them. I don't think you should have to run the pick'em and be the baby sitter. Ryan couldnt keep up with being a baby sitter. Doug couldn't keep up with being a baby sitter, and you shouldn't have to either. Let the respective division mates baby sit. Also, i thought we implemented a rule as i stated earlier where 1 person can't pick over a set amount of times or keep all things equal? Well this will be the last year of the pick em. I'm not going to lose out on points because other GMs suck at life. Hell no to that. Everything else in the league is by participation, meaning if they want to participate they can. Why not just get a group of GMs who agree to do this and then penalize from that group. I'm sorry but this will have to be revamped if that's the direction it's going to go. I don't mind losing because someone just sucks at making correct picks, but I'll be damned if I lose because GMs aren't participating. That my friend is in no way fair. In Pickem We Trust
|
|
|
Post by IamQuailman on Nov 12, 2014 17:12:38 GMT -6
Seriously though, no one is losing out on points. You or anyone isn't getting docked points for not doing it. If you really were worried about losing out on points, you could've gone back and done a legit presser.... lol
|
|
|
Post by thesyndicate on Nov 12, 2014 17:59:19 GMT -6
I will give props to nick, though, first ever 2 page Pick'em!
|
|
|
Post by Conroy on Nov 12, 2014 20:36:49 GMT -6
Just wanted to say good job nick. The standings have been updated this is a hard thing to do and makes each sim a little more interesting
|
|
|
Post by Nick Malone 77 on Nov 13, 2014 15:07:31 GMT -6
|
|